Plowing recap: key questions, answers about Snowmageddon 2014
Now that Snowmageddon 2014 is over, it’s
time for a Q&A about how Eagle Nest weathered the storm. The Board heard
from several residents, many with questions, complaints and compliments, so the following themes are centered on those communications.
First, reminder about how bad it was: Snow began
falling the morning of Sunday, Jan. 5, and didn’t stop until the afternoon of
Monday, Jan. 6. Official accumulation was 11 inches – about an inch an hour – the
second-biggest snowfall in Indianapolis
history, and the minus-15 temperature Monday morning was the coldest in 20
years. Most businesses were closed Monday, many on Tuesday. Lawrence Township
schools were closed the entire week. Tens of thousands were without power,
though luckily few in our neighborhood were affected. In short, it was very bad.
(To read more about the severity of the storm, click
here for a Page One Sunday story from The Indianapolis Star.)
Question: How long
did it take to plow the neighborhood?
Answer: Everything
except two courts (Warbler and Tanager) was done by Tuesday night, which was on
par with surrounding neighborhoods and about 24 hours after the snow had
stopped early Monday. The city of Indianapolis/Lawrence
were a day behind or longer in many areas. Anyone who drove Hague Road or the surrounding streets Monday
knows first-hand just how bad the storm was and how our plowing stacked up
against others.
Question: What
was the strategy?
Answer: For snows
of more than 4 inches, Eagle Nest’s long-standing policy is to address the main
thoroughfares first so emergency vehicles can access the neighborhood. After
that, the inlets or necks of cul-de-sacs are plowed to do the same, but not the
entire circle. Once emergency access is established throughout the
neighborhood, plowing continues until everything – including the interiors of
the cul-de-sacs -- has been cleared.
For cul-de-sacs in particular, the Board has the option of
making two passes around the outside perimeter edges to clear a path for
residents while leaving the center untouched. This option is most effective for
snowfalls around 3-5 inches and is employed by municipalities in other states
with larger snowfalls. Unfortunately, last weekend’s large, fast accumulation
prevented that option this time and forced us to alter our approach.
Question: Why are
cul-de-sacs so difficult to plow?
Answer: Not all
courts are the same size, which means there sometimes is less space to push the
snow. Obviously, that doesn’t mean our contractor should block driveways with
snow, but sometimes mistakes happen. We had reports of at least two blocked driveways,
and in both cases our contractor returned to correct the problem within 24
hours. Plowing crews have been instructed to push snow out of cul-de-sacs to
the inlet necks or straight out to the facing lots, but that’s not always
feasible when vehicles are left in the roadway.
Question: Any
problems?
Answer: A variety
-- a lot of snow, record-cold
temperatures, a handful of roadways obstructed by resident vehicles. Our
contractor had two mechanical problems, a flat tire while working Tanager Court and a
radiator leak while working on Mockingbird
Lane. Both incidents forced a delay in work on
those areas. Further, the extreme cold prevented effective use of salt,
inhibiting the breakdown of snowpack and ice. Lastly, Mayor Greg Ballard
imposed a travel ban Monday for all but emergency vehicles, restricting our
crews’ ability to work the roads.
Again, the Board can’t emphasis enough the importance of
keeping the roads clear of vehicles during snowfall. Vehicles parked along the
curb interfere with our plowing efforts, create dangerous roadblocks, obstruct
motorists’ view and is inconsiderate to neighbors who pay for and deserve clear
roads in a timely manner. If you see a neighbor’s car in the street during a
storm, please contact them and ask them to move it.
Question: Why
didn’t the plowing crews keep up with the snow as it fell?
Answer: It would
not have been economically feasible to have a crew come back every three to
four hours, not unless everyone wants to pay higher dues. Plowing costs range
from $1,500 to $2,000 to do the entire neighborhood, including salt and followup.
The Board decided to wait for the bulk of the storm to pass before having the
contractor begin secondary runs. Late in the storm cycle, however, the travel
ban was instituted. Our crews are human, of course, and can’t work around the
clock. They needed to sleep sometime.
Question: Why
were there repeated passes, forcing residents to shovel the ends of their
driveways for two days?
Answer: Simply
put, the repeated passes were necessary for overall neighborhood safety. Many
of our roads simply were not deemed passable enough to leave things be after
plowing the first day. That was true in virtually every corner of the city. Our
plowing contractor could only do so much that first 24 hours, and then the
travel ban was issued. Further, the harsh conditions made it difficult to see the
curbs were during the initial plowing, resulting in countless inaccessible
mailboxes. That was corrected by extra runs.
Question: Any
damage reported?
Answer: Two
mailboxes were knocked off their posts along Teel Way. The Board is working with the
contractor to make contact and arrange repairs soonest.
Question: How
many complaints were reported?
Answer: Clubhouse
Manager Kelly Wright and President Scott Thien received about two dozen communications
from 15 households via email or phone calls. Ten of them were questions about
the timing of the plowing or requests, seven were negative, and six were
positive* or thank you emails.
(*Editor's note: Since this post was made, the Board received two more complimentary emails regarding the plowing, bringing the total of positive emails to eight.)
(*Editor's note: Since this post was made, the Board received two more complimentary emails regarding the plowing, bringing the total of positive emails to eight.)
Question: How did
the Board communicate with the neighborhood about the plowing?
Answer: The Board
relied on three main communication channels: the Eagle Nest blog, Facebook and
Constant Contact email blast. The blog is the primary source for neighborhood
news and carried daily updates the whole week. Our Facebook page content is lifted directly to the blog. Urgent messages
– such as the pre-storm warning and request to remove cars from roadways – go
out via Constant Contact, our monthly email-based messaging tool. Here’s how to access
each:
- Blog: Bookmark the public site http://eaglenestindy.blogspot.com
- Facebook: www.facebook.com/pages/ENPOA/253652287516 (Register, then search ENPOA)
- Constant Contact: Send an email to enpoa_sec@att.net to subscribe to our free email blast.
Please note: These are the only official sources for Eagle
Nest news. Other outlets or sites purporting to contain neighborhood news are
not endorsed by the Board and may contain inaccuracies. The Board encourages
all residents to utilize at least one of these options to stay informed about
important neighborhood news, events, crime developments, etc.
Question: What is
the Board’s grade for the plowing?
Answer: Solid B. One
Board member gave an A, five members gave Bs of varying degrees and one gave an
F.
Do you have a question or comment?
As always, the Board welcomes residents’ feedback. Feel free to email Kelly Wright or Scott Thien with your comments. Thanks for your patience and
understanding during what turned out to be a storm unmatched in decades. Here’s
to hoping that was the last big snow of the season!
-- Submitted by Scott Thien
Comments
Post a Comment